When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
The official court record is maintained from the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not available over the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot attain out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decreased courts.
From the United States, individuals are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember one particular rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as is possible, leading the court, not only for the case, but to the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Only the written opinions from the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals are routinely out there. Decisions from the lessen (trial) courts are not generally published or dispersed.
Article 27 with the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is while in the crystal clear negation of your legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, ensuring a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and enthusiasts alike.
Generally, only an appeal accepted through the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For several reasons, these kinds of appeals in many cases are not granted.
States also generally have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, for instance family rylands v fletcher case law regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending around the relationship between the deciding court and also the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in Ny is not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may possibly help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more